… is any recognition (OK, I exaggerate, there has been some recognition) that the lifting of excommunication for four bishops ordained in 1988 by the late French Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was only a first step — not the last — in regularizing Bishop Williamson and the others into the good graces of the Catholic Church.
The latest to miss the point was German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who today said Pope Benedict XVI and the Vatican needed to make clear there could be no denial of the Holocaust by someone like Bishop Williamson. The Vatican spokesman, Jesuit Father Federico Lombardi, quickly replied with a statement that the pope has clearly distanced himself from the bishop’s remarks that no Jews died in Nazi gas chambers.
A story of ours that hasn’t been getting the Web views that it deserves is last week’s Vatican Letter, by CNS Rome bureau chief John Thavis. He wrote:
When the pope lifted the excommunication of four of the society’s bishops in January, it finally seemed to open the way to the elusive “full communion” between the society’s leadership and the Catholic Church.
But the ending of this story has not yet been written, and even inside the Vatican there are questions about what the pope’s latest move really signifies for the short term and the long term.
One of the biggest short-term questions regards the standing of the Swiss-based society’s bishops and priests — specifically, whether in the Vatican’s view they remain suspended from their ministry until a more complete agreement is reached.
The answer, according to several Vatican sources, is that there’s no clear answer.
Thavis goes on to describe the “canonical mess” that remains and that hundreds of details remain to be negotiated, including “the elephant in the room” — the willingness of the Lefebvre bishops to accept the teachings of the Second Vatican Council.
Read the entire column for a better understanding that these bishops are a long way from being in full communion with Rome.
UPDATE: The Vatican’s Feb. 4 statement clarified some of these issues, noting for instance that Bishop Williamson must distance himself from his previous statements in “an absolutely unequivocal and public manner.”